🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward similar measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to approve a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," stated one MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust data".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation established by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," said a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the local level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, other states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

Even as this global debate continues, the actions of this nation and its followers show that states around the world are less and less willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.